I have really enjoyed listening to the various presentations that have been presented so far! I am looking forward to Monday when I get to present my presentation. The presentation I liked the most was the "Top 5 Best Real Men of Genius." There were a couple reasons why I enjoyed this presentation. The main reason I enjoyed this presentation is because I was laughing almost the whole time. The second reason I enjoyed this presentation is because in high school, I downloaded every Real Men of Genius commercial ever created and listened to them all. So this topic was appealing to me since I have had interest in it before. I don't know that I actually learned anything from this presentation. I learned little facts about the company like changing the commercials from Real American Heroes to Real Men of Genius after 9/11. I also learned many other little interesting facts. Bryson was an effective speaker because he brought humor into his presentation. He was able to effectively use the PowerPoint and audio, while also being able to speak about the subject. He did not rely completely on his PowerPoint, but let his PowerPoint supplement his presentation.
The second presentation that I really enjoyed was the "soccer celebrations" by Keegan Priest. I found this presentation very appealing since I have played soccer for practically my whole life. The presentation was also humorous, which made it more enjoyable. I can personally relate to this presentation because growing up around soccer, I have seen many of these celebrations first hand. I learned many new styles of celebrating in soccer that I had previously never heard of. One of my favorite new celebration styles that I learned from Keegan's presentation is putting on a mask after you score a goal and running around. I thought that Keegan was an effective speaker because he incorporated humor in telling the facts about how to "celebrate" in soccer. He could have just stood up at the podium and spoke about being people doing dances, flips, wearing costumes, etc. But instead of doing this, Keegan added videos and pictures that gave the class examples of what he was talking about.
The third presentation that I really enjoyed was the "Coffee Options" presentation. I will be the first to tell you that I do not like coffee at all. I guess it is this strong dislike for coffee that made this presentation interesting to me. This presentation was enjoyable because it informed me on information that I previously did not know or understand. Since I had no background with understanding the different types of coffee, I was drawn into listening more about the various types of coffee. I can definitely say that after listening to the presentation, I am much more knowledgeable about the various options you have when ordering coffee. I found that the presenter was very knowledgeable about the subject, which helped me to establish creditability. The presenter showed that she had much knowledge about coffee and the various options when ordering coffee. It is this credibility and knowledge that helped the presenter to be effective. I also feel that this presenter was effective because her PowerPoint slides were a good mix between facts, statements, and pictures. By adding pictures into the presentation, she gave variety to the presentation. This variety in the presentation kept the audience from getting bored with the presentation.
Friday, February 27, 2009
Monday, February 16, 2009
Reviewing Collegegrad.com for Cover Letter Advice
To start out, I have already written a draft of my cover letter for this class. So, with that being said, I have already done some research about cover letters on my own. There is one section of the collegegrad.com website that stood out to me: the sample cover letter section. This section stood out to me because it's easy going website to website reading about what you SHOULD do while writing your cover letter. It's more difficult to find real life examples of cover letters that you can read to make sure you have a good basis of how your own cover letter show flow.
There was a part of the collegegrad.com website that I disagreed with about writing cover letters and that was the information the website gave about the postscript technique. I will say first, before I critique this method, that I am not a professional at writing cover letters, so this advice could very well be good advice and I am just not accustomed to seeing it in use. The website said that it would capture your reader's attention if you put a "P.S." at the end of your cover letter and then followed the "P.S." with an interesting fact or atribute about a previous accomplishment. This, to me, seems like it might seem as if you are bragging on yourself a little much. It seems like the "P.S." goes beyond just discussing how you would be good for the job to just making yourself big-headed. I personally believe that the person reading your cover letter might be turned off to the fact that you think so highly of yourself, like you are flaunting it in from of that person.
I found it interesting that collegegrad.com claims that most employers do not look at your cover letter first, they look at your resume. I found this interesting just because I have always been told to make sure my cover letter did not have any gramatical errors and that it was written in the correct format. I was told that a cover letter is what an employer truly focuses on because it contains the highlights of why you would make a good candidate for the job. After I read this article on collegegrad.com, it makes sense that employers might just jump straight to reading your resume because it ultimately contains all the information on where you have worked. Employers often rate previous experience highly when deciding which candidate to select for a job. So after reading the article, it makes sense to me that an employer might read your resume before reading your cover letter. After all, your cover letter sometimes contains more information than is relevant for an employer to determine, initially, if you are a possible candidate for a job.
The cover letter checklist is definitely something that I found helpful. The checklist was helpful because you can just glance at your cover letter and make sure you have completed all the items that are on the checklist. After you complete the cover letter checklist, you know you are not leaving anything technical out of your cover letter.
There was a part of the collegegrad.com website that I disagreed with about writing cover letters and that was the information the website gave about the postscript technique. I will say first, before I critique this method, that I am not a professional at writing cover letters, so this advice could very well be good advice and I am just not accustomed to seeing it in use. The website said that it would capture your reader's attention if you put a "P.S." at the end of your cover letter and then followed the "P.S." with an interesting fact or atribute about a previous accomplishment. This, to me, seems like it might seem as if you are bragging on yourself a little much. It seems like the "P.S." goes beyond just discussing how you would be good for the job to just making yourself big-headed. I personally believe that the person reading your cover letter might be turned off to the fact that you think so highly of yourself, like you are flaunting it in from of that person.
I found it interesting that collegegrad.com claims that most employers do not look at your cover letter first, they look at your resume. I found this interesting just because I have always been told to make sure my cover letter did not have any gramatical errors and that it was written in the correct format. I was told that a cover letter is what an employer truly focuses on because it contains the highlights of why you would make a good candidate for the job. After I read this article on collegegrad.com, it makes sense that employers might just jump straight to reading your resume because it ultimately contains all the information on where you have worked. Employers often rate previous experience highly when deciding which candidate to select for a job. So after reading the article, it makes sense to me that an employer might read your resume before reading your cover letter. After all, your cover letter sometimes contains more information than is relevant for an employer to determine, initially, if you are a possible candidate for a job.
The cover letter checklist is definitely something that I found helpful. The checklist was helpful because you can just glance at your cover letter and make sure you have completed all the items that are on the checklist. After you complete the cover letter checklist, you know you are not leaving anything technical out of your cover letter.
Friday, February 13, 2009
Thoughts on Our Group Project
First off, I think this group project idea for Redfern is a great idea! This is a perfect example of the types of problems that we (the class) could come across in a couple years when we enter the workforce. As I listened to our speaker describe the program and what our goals were, I had several thoughts. The one thought that really stood out in my mind, which I will discuss with my group during our first meeting, was the idea of how to make the buildings around campus "green." There are many buildings around our campus which were built more recent than others. These more recent buildings are more "green" than most of the other buildings around campus.
The one things that stands out to me is the lack of energy efficient light bulbs that are being used around campus. I lived in Geer Hall (one of the shoeboxes) last year, and there was not a single energy efficient bulb in the whole building. Each room had six light bulbs in it, one in each closet (2), two bulbs for the main light in the center of the room, and two bulbs over the sink. Replacing existing incandescent light bulbs with energy efficient bulbs is an easy way to make our campus "greener." I do understand that fact that incandescent bulbs are much cheaper than compact florescent bulbs, but looks at the pros that go along with using compact florescent bulbs. Compact fluorescent bulbs last much longer than regular bulbs, do not produce as much heat, and use less wattage which leads to lower power usage. In addition to the simple costs, think about how costly it is to send maintenance staff out to the dorms each time a bulb burns out. The maintenance department could save money by putting in compact fluorescent bulbs which would reduce the amount of trips maintenance staff spent back and forth to dorms. Yes, maintenance staff would still have to replace bulbs as they burn out, but it would be much less frequent trips.
Another thought that stands out to me is replacing old windows such as those in Lowry and the surrounding older buildings. I had several classes in those type buildings my Freshman year and it appears they still have single pane windows in them. These windows are extremely old and out of date. Double pane windows would make much more sense to the University because it would conserve on the costs of heating and cooling the buildings.
There are many little things like this around campus that could easily be changed to produce a "greener" campus. I understand that the University is facing financial shortfalls in the current economic state, but as a group, we could hopefully produce a viable strategy to raise money for these upgrades and additions. With working with my fellow classmates, I feel that we can create a viable strategy that could be implemented on campus to make our buildings "greener." If this plan was successful here on the Clemson campus, there is no reason why we could not build a universal plan that could apply to colleges across the country.
The one things that stands out to me is the lack of energy efficient light bulbs that are being used around campus. I lived in Geer Hall (one of the shoeboxes) last year, and there was not a single energy efficient bulb in the whole building. Each room had six light bulbs in it, one in each closet (2), two bulbs for the main light in the center of the room, and two bulbs over the sink. Replacing existing incandescent light bulbs with energy efficient bulbs is an easy way to make our campus "greener." I do understand that fact that incandescent bulbs are much cheaper than compact florescent bulbs, but looks at the pros that go along with using compact florescent bulbs. Compact fluorescent bulbs last much longer than regular bulbs, do not produce as much heat, and use less wattage which leads to lower power usage. In addition to the simple costs, think about how costly it is to send maintenance staff out to the dorms each time a bulb burns out. The maintenance department could save money by putting in compact fluorescent bulbs which would reduce the amount of trips maintenance staff spent back and forth to dorms. Yes, maintenance staff would still have to replace bulbs as they burn out, but it would be much less frequent trips.
Another thought that stands out to me is replacing old windows such as those in Lowry and the surrounding older buildings. I had several classes in those type buildings my Freshman year and it appears they still have single pane windows in them. These windows are extremely old and out of date. Double pane windows would make much more sense to the University because it would conserve on the costs of heating and cooling the buildings.
There are many little things like this around campus that could easily be changed to produce a "greener" campus. I understand that the University is facing financial shortfalls in the current economic state, but as a group, we could hopefully produce a viable strategy to raise money for these upgrades and additions. With working with my fellow classmates, I feel that we can create a viable strategy that could be implemented on campus to make our buildings "greener." If this plan was successful here on the Clemson campus, there is no reason why we could not build a universal plan that could apply to colleges across the country.
Thursday, February 5, 2009
Interview Mistakes
After reading the article on common interview mistakes, I realized how easy it would be to make some of these mistakes in an interview if you were nervous. When you go into an interview and you're nervous, you are not in the best state of mind. I think the first interview mistake is probably the biggest, "Don't ask stupid questions!" Like I said, when you are nervous, you are not in the best state of mind, so you have to watch what you are thinking about saying to make sure it is a relevant question. I do agree that treating the secretary poorly is a big mistake, but I don't know if I would rank it #2 biggest mistake. I think I would put lying in an interview above lying to a secretary. I think the #4 biggest mistake for me would be interviewers not being ready for the interviews. It's easy to just go into an interview thinking you will be able to rattle off answers off the top of your head, but when you are nervous, there are a million thoughts running through your head. The website said, "not asking people for help" ranked as the #8 biggest mistake, which I think corresponds with my #4 biggest mistake of not being prepared.
I have never had a job interview. I have worked one job in Greenville, SC with RealtyLink, LLC. It is a real estate development company that specializes in commercial real estate. I did not have to interview for the job because I knew one of the owners pretty well. Although I have never had a job interview, I have had a different kind of interview. My freshman year at Clemson, I was considering joining a co-ed business fraternity, Delta Sigma Pi. I went through the process of getting a bid, which consisted of an interview. For the interview, there was a panel of four fraternity members at a table. I sat down at the table with the four members. The four members took turns asking me questions in which I would answer. It was not a difficult interview, but there were several questions that I stumbled on. Being a quick thinker, I was able to recover, but the interview could have been better if I would have prepared. Just from going through this interview, I see the importance of preparing for a job interview. Needless to say, I received a bid from Delta Sigma Pi, but I turned it down a few days later due to personal reasons.
I think an easy way for a person to get prepared for an interview is to go online and read through popular interview questions. You can go to google and search "popular interview questions" and it will return thousands of websites. Yes, most of these websites contain similar type questions. But, you can easily take two or three websites and just read through all the questions and make sure you have answers for them. Take these questions and try to tailor them to the job position you are interviewing for. Maybe print these questions off and sit down with a friend. Have your friend ask you different questions in a random for you to answer. In your interview, there will probably be questions that you did not practice on the internet, but at least you had a good bit of preparation. It is impossible to determine every question that an interviewer will ask you, but you do need to be as prepared as possible.
I have never had a job interview. I have worked one job in Greenville, SC with RealtyLink, LLC. It is a real estate development company that specializes in commercial real estate. I did not have to interview for the job because I knew one of the owners pretty well. Although I have never had a job interview, I have had a different kind of interview. My freshman year at Clemson, I was considering joining a co-ed business fraternity, Delta Sigma Pi. I went through the process of getting a bid, which consisted of an interview. For the interview, there was a panel of four fraternity members at a table. I sat down at the table with the four members. The four members took turns asking me questions in which I would answer. It was not a difficult interview, but there were several questions that I stumbled on. Being a quick thinker, I was able to recover, but the interview could have been better if I would have prepared. Just from going through this interview, I see the importance of preparing for a job interview. Needless to say, I received a bid from Delta Sigma Pi, but I turned it down a few days later due to personal reasons.
I think an easy way for a person to get prepared for an interview is to go online and read through popular interview questions. You can go to google and search "popular interview questions" and it will return thousands of websites. Yes, most of these websites contain similar type questions. But, you can easily take two or three websites and just read through all the questions and make sure you have answers for them. Take these questions and try to tailor them to the job position you are interviewing for. Maybe print these questions off and sit down with a friend. Have your friend ask you different questions in a random for you to answer. In your interview, there will probably be questions that you did not practice on the internet, but at least you had a good bit of preparation. It is impossible to determine every question that an interviewer will ask you, but you do need to be as prepared as possible.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
